| 000 | 01382nab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20231029153953.0 | ||
| 007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
| 008 | 231029b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aMinnikin, David E _959017 |
||
| 245 |
_aRecognising the broad array of approaches available for the diagnosis of ancient tuberculosis: _bComment on Infectious diseases and Neolithic transformations (Fuchs et al. 2019 The Holocene 29: 1545–1557)/ |
||
| 260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
| 300 | _aVol. 30, issue 5, 2020 ( 781–783 p.). | ||
| 520 | _aThe characterisation of ancient tuberculosis is not totally dependent on the recovery of intact genomes. Judicious combinations of ancient DNA fragments and specific lipid biomarkers provide unambiguous diagnosis and these protocols are capable of refinement and extension. Currently, there is no direct evidence for exclusive co-evolution of humans and tuberculosis. A developing body of data suggests that the initial evolution of tuberculosis may readily have taken place in a range of Pleistocene megafauna. | ||
| 700 |
_aLee, Oona Y-C _959018 |
||
| 700 |
_aWu, Houdini HT _959019 |
||
| 700 |
_aBesra, Gurdyal S _959020 |
||
| 700 |
_aDonoghue, Helen D _959021 |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_012756 _917200 _dLondon: Sage Publication Ltd, 2019. _tHolocene/ _x09596836 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619895572 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
| 999 |
_c15070 _d15070 |
||