000 01355nab a2200205 4500
003 OSt
005 20231012112212.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 231012b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aDeVerteuil, Geoffrey
_958631
245 _aRelational geographies of the voluntary sector:
_bDisentangling the ballast of strangers/
260 _bSage,
_c2020.
300 _aVol. 44, issue 5, 2020 ( 919–937 p.).
520 _aWe propose that voluntary sector geographies are best understood using a systematic relational approach, drawing upon neo-Marxist and symbiotic perspectives. We focus on relations between the voluntary sector and the (shadow) state, internal spaces of client interaction, and external urban spaces. Our relational approach advances alternative understandings of the voluntary sector: ones that are partly but not fully in the orbit of the shadow state; more mediator than conduit for neoliberal policies; partly punitive, yet firmly in relation with other ambivalent measures for clients; and both spatially uneven and fixed, but always unbounded in its practices.
700 _aPower, Andrew
_958632
700 _aTrudeau, Dan
_958633
773 0 _012579
_917141
_dLondon: Sage Publication Ltd, 2019.
_tProgress in human geography/
_x 03091325
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519869461
942 _2ddc
_cEJR
999 _c14965
_d14965