000			01927nab a2200205 4500
003			OSt
005			20231011145855.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			231011b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMartin, Diana _958620
245			_aRethinking the camp: _bOn spatial technologies of power and resistance/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol. 44, issue 4, 2020 ( 743–768 p.).
520			_aIn light of the recent proliferation and co-presence of institutional and makeshift camps and encampments in Europe, this article explores the current multifaceted geographies of the camp and their formal and informal spatialities. By engaging with key work in ‘camp studies’ we analyse contemporary institutional and makeshift refugee camps in their complex relationship. While the review of the existing literature is a fundamental starting point for our analysis, in this article we propose to depart from a perspective exclusively focussed on institutional camps to incorporate a reflection on the informal encampments that have recently proliferated in Europe. In particular, we reflect on how these makeshift spatial formations are associated with the presence and workings of institutional camps, at times in a complementary, almost symbiotic relationship. We conclude by suggesting that camps should not be studied in isolation and that both institutional and informal camps should be examined as dynamic spaces that may be transformed and appropriated by their residents, becoming part of the current fragmented mobilities of irregular migrations across Europe and of the related political geographies of bordering, smuggling, and humanitarian care.
700			_aMinca, Claudio _958621
700			_aKatz, Irit _958622
773	0		_012579 _917141 _dLondon: Sage Publication Ltd, 2019. _tProgress in human geography/ _x 03091325
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519856702
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14956 _d14956