000			02006nab a2200217 4500
003			OSt
005			20230910132927.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230910b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aReid-Musson, Emily _957678
245			_aFeminist economic geography and the future of work/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol. 52, Issue 7, 2020 ( 1457–1468 p.)
520			_aScholars have recently begun to account for the absence of feminist analyses in the popular and academic discourse surrounding ‘the future of work’. In this article we offer a critical synthesis of emerging research from feminist economic geography to propose a series of questions about the future of work, conceptualized as both an object of intellectual inquiry and an emerging empirical reality. Feminist economic geography emphasizes difference, embodiment, and conceives of workplaces as dynamic, uneven, and untidy spaces, an emphasis which can help recenter discussions about the future of work on workers and their experience of work. Our discussion features a series of analytically rigorous, theoretically informed, and empirically rich conference papers, organized around three critical questions: Who are the subjects of the future of work? What counts as work? And where should we look? We highlight a broad concept of work developed through debates among feminist scholars across disciplinary fields as a key frame for understanding the global economy, including difference, social reproduction, and the spatial division of labor. Feminist economic geographers are pluralizing the subjects, forms, and geographies of work, which may help enhance our understanding of the future of work in economic geography.
700			_aCockayne, Daniel _957679
700			_aFrederiksen, Lia _957680
700			_aWorth, Nancy _957681
773	0		_08877 _917103 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning A _x1472-3409
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20947101
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14557 _d14557