000			01607nab a2200229 4500
003			OSt
005			20230910124742.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230910b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aJames D Sidaway _957661
245			_aIntroduction: _bResearch agendas raised by the Belt and Road Initiative/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol 38, Issue 5, 2020 (795–802 p.)
520			_aWe introduce this symposium on the politics and spaces of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, locating the papers as concept explorations resting on case studies that contextualize and historicize Belt and Road Initiative. In the case of the first paper that follows, this includes an exploration of the historiography of one of Belt and Road Initiative’s conditions of possibility, the Silk Road idea. We chart a burgeoning field of debate about Belt and Road Initiative, most often operating at broad levels of geopolitical abstraction. The papers here encourage further investigations of Belt and Road Initiative’s dynamics. Such work holds promise for wider theorizing of the interfaces between culture, economy, place, space, politics and infrastructure. Our closing remarks sketch key research agendas in these domains in the light of Belt and Road Initiative.
700			_aSimon C Rowedder _957662
700			_aWoon, Chih Yuan _957663
700			_aLin, Weiqiang _955875
700			_aPholsena, Vatthana _957664
773	0		_08872 _917105 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning C: _x1472-3425
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420911410
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14547 _d14547