000 | 02020nab a2200193 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230831105314.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230831b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aWang, June _957354 |
||
245 |
_aSocial factory as prosaic state space: _bRedefining labour in China’s mass innovation/mass entrepreneurship campaign/ |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol. 52, Issue 3, 2020 ( 510–531 p.) | ||
520 | _aThis study examines China’s mass innovation/mass entrepreneurship campaign, with particular attention to the community of maker-entrepreneurs in the new techno-political ordering of society and their social territories. This raises the question of the subject-making of maker-entrepreneurs on a massive scale through what we call the new education–incubatory assemblage. How does the new education–incubatory machine assemble a new participatory community, form a production–communications–consumption circuit to imagine the new economy and re-territorialise the techno-political ordering of society? Our study stresses two differences in the social factory. First, by forging a fragmented pattern of production and an individualised society, mass entrepreneurship emphasises social networking. The exploitation of social relations in production has been brought to the foreground. Second, a participatory mass is not only shaped by the new mentality, but also constitutive of the very formation of the new mentality. Such a mass is a collection of actors, from the government, cooperatives, start-ups and individuals. In addition, their agencies vary, from those with a more reified form of power, such as policy, to the mundane, unrehearsed actions of individuals. This process entails the reconfiguration of political apparatus and bio-political power. | ||
700 |
_aTan, Yujing _957355 |
||
773 | 0 |
_08877 _917103 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning A _x1472-3409 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19889633 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
999 |
_c14405 _d14405 |