000			01240nab a2200181 4500
003			OSt
005			20230829182609.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230829b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aPedersen, Ole W. _957295
245			_aNetworks of human rights and climate change: _bState of the Netherlands v Stichting Urgenda, Supreme Court of the Netherlands, 20 December 2019 19/00135/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol. 22, Issue 3, 2020 ( 227–234 p.)
520			_aClimate change litigators are increasingly relying on a range of different jurisdictional avenues and legal regimes. The recent Urgenda decision by the Dutch Supreme Court provides a surprisingly rare snapshot of the relevance of human rights law to climate change litigation. Focusing on the Supreme Court's reliance on the environmental rights case law from the ECHR, this case note argues that climate change and human rights adjudications takes the form of an adjudicatory network. This network creates spaces for domestic courts to develop contingent responses to emerging climate change claims.
773	0		_011304 _917102 _dSage, 2019. _tEnvironmental law review
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1461452920953655
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14372 _d14372