000			01897nab a2200193 4500
003			OSt
005			20230731095524.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230731b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aDyckman, Caitlin S. _956500
245			_aNovel Methods, Novel Metrics: _bUsing a Meta-Ethnography to Create a Plan Quality Framework for Sustainable and Resilient Social–Ecological Systems/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol 35, Issue 3, 2020 ( 281–297 p.)
520			_aSocial–ecological resilience (SER) and sustainable commons management (SCM) are process- and outcome-based paradigms for natural resource management. Resource management plans foster them, but traditional plan quality assessment typically omits process dimensions. We examined what constitutes an appropriate plan quality evaluation framework for resource management plans that reflect these SER and SCM paradigms. In order to create a plan quality instrument for assessing embedded SER and SCM processes, we employed a two-part methodology of a meta-ethnographic analysis and then used the results to augment current advances in plan quality evaluation to assess adaptation efforts. While methodologically novel in the academic planning canon, the meta-ethnographic approach has been used to inductively synthesize qualitative studies’ results in, for example, the fields of public health, medicine, and education. Our use advances plan quality evaluation with a new metric that combines the paradigmatic resource management strategies and addresses identified shortcomings in the more novel adaptive plan quality evaluation approach that builds on the former, traditional one.
700			_aConroy, Maria Manta _956501
773	0		_09169 _917010 _dCalifornia Sage Publications _tJournal of planning literature _x08854122
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220914990
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14086 _d14086