000 | 01535nab a22001937a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230318091333.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230318b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _c | ||
100 |
_aKiely, Ray _955210 |
||
245 |
_aAssessing Conservative Populism: _bA New Double Movement or Neoliberal Populism? / |
||
260 |
_bWiley, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol 51, issue 2, 2020 : (398-417 p.). | ||
520 | _aThis article examines the populist turn through the lens of changing social policy by relating this to the question of whether or not conservative and far-right populism represent a break from, or a new mutation of, neoliberalism. Does this shift represent a conservative Polanyian double movement, or a mutation and extension of neoliberalism? This question is examined through a brief account of neoliberalism's failures, both before and after 2008, and how conservative populism challenged it, particularly around the question of liberal social policy. In then defining and discussing neoliberalism, the article shows how conservative populism in some respects challenges it, through its focus on re-politicization in the face of technocratic and economistic de-politicization and disenchantment. But the article then demonstrates important similarities and continuities in both neoliberal theory and populist practice. | ||
773 | 0 |
_08737 _916865 _dWest Sussex John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1970 _tDevelopment and change _x0012-155X |
|
856 | _u https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12567 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||
999 |
_c13583 _d13583 |