000 | 01763nab a22001937a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230316173158.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230316b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _c | ||
100 |
_aUpton, Caroline _955197 |
||
245 | _aConserving Natures? Co-producing Payments for Ecosystem Services in Mongolian Rangelands / | ||
260 |
_bWiley, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol 51, issue 1, 2020 : (224-252 p.). | ||
520 | _aDespite well-founded concerns over the proliferation of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes, critical geographers have begun to challenge the ‘milieu of apprehension’ associated with PES (Jackson and Palmer, 2014: 122). There is a growing call for more nuanced analyses of ways in which the ecosystem services paradigm and PES may, in particular circumstances, encompass and make legible diverse ways of being in/knowing nature and provide opportunities for local/indigenous actors to advance their own needs and values. Adopting a ‘radical pragmatist’ approach, the author of this article worked with Mongolian herder groups to develop a locally-grounded manifestation of PES, with specific attention to the incorporation of diverse socio-ecological relations, beliefs and values. The article argues that such co-produced iterations of PES, with due attention to tripartite dimensions of environmental justice, can facilitate local stewardship, whilst eschewing enclosure of commons and crowding out of non-market values and motives for conservation, albeit shaped and constrained by diverse manifestations of power. | ||
773 | 0 |
_08737 _916865 _dWest Sussex John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1970 _tDevelopment and change _x0012-155X |
|
856 | _u https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12549 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||
999 |
_c13575 _d13575 |