000 | 01506nab a2200181 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20221004103624.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 221004b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aKamete, Amin Y _953728 |
||
245 |
_aNeither friend nor enemy: Planning, ambivalence and the invalidation of urban informality in Zimbabwe/ _cAmin Y Kamete |
||
260 |
_aLondon: _bSage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol 57, issue 5, 2020: (927–943 p.) | ||
520 | _aPlanning relies on the strict classification and disposition of things in space. Intended to establish and maintain order, planning’s classifying practices are reinforced by binarisms that revolve around legality/illegality. The article deploys Bauman’s notion of the ‘stranger’ to recast hostility to informality as a symptom of antipathy against strangerhood and ambivalence. Drawing from qualitative research in urban Zimbabwe, I posit that because informality cannot be pigeonholed as either ‘friend’ or ‘enemy’, it instils a sense of unease in planners. I argue that this is a failure of the pursuit of order through binary antagonisms and contend that fixation with binarisms spawns ‘spatial undecidables’ and fuels resentment against informality. I propose that the notion of strangerhood complements and extends the concept of ‘gray spacing’. | ||
773 | 0 |
_08843 _916581 _dLondon Sage Publications Ltd. 1964 _tUrban studies _x0042-0980 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018821588 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||
999 |
_c13254 _d13254 |