000 01673nab a2200289 4500
003 OSt
005 20220804092628.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 220804b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aSmeets, Jeroen B. J.
_951098
245 _aSome Illusions Are More Inconsistent Than Others/
260 _bsage
_c2019
300 _aVol 48, Issue 7, 2019 : (638-641 p.).
520 _aIllusions are characterized by inconsistencies. For instance, in the motion aftereffect, we see motion without an equivalent change in position. We used a simple pencil-and-paper experiment to determine whether illusions that influence an object’s apparent size give rise to equivalent changes in apparent positions along the object’s outline. We found different results for two equally strong size illusions. The Ebbinghaus illusion affected perceived positions in a way that was consistent with its influence on perceived size, but a modified diagonal illusion did not affect perceived positions. This difference between the illusions might explain why there are so many conflicting reports about the effects of size illusions on the maximum grip aperture during reach-to-grasp movements.
650 _avisual illusions,
_949257
650 _asize,
_951099
650 _agrasping,
_951100
650 _ainconsistency,
_951101
650 _aSander illusion,
_951102
650 _a Titchener illusion,
_951103
650 _a perception/action,
_949364
650 _atwo visual systems
_951104
700 _aBrenner, Eli
_950552
773 0 _012374
_916462
_dSage,
_tPerception
_x1468-4233
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619853147
942 _2ddc
_cART
999 _c12719
_d12719