000 01956nab a2200253 4500
003 OSt
005 20220803122717.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 220803b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aPark, So Hyun
_950779
245 _aFalling for a Fake:
_bThe Role of Kinematic and Non-kinematic Information in Deception Detection/
260 _bsage
_c2019
300 _aVol 48, Issue 4, 2019 : ( 330-337 p.).
520 _aKinematic and non-kinematic visual information have been examined in the context of movement anticipation by athletes, although less so in deception detection. This study examined the role of kinematic and non-kinematic visual information in the anticipation of deceptive and non-deceptive badminton shots. Skilled (n = 12) and less skilled (n = 12) badminton players anticipated the direction of deceptive and non-deceptive shots presented via video footage displayed in normal (kinematic and non-kinematic information), low (kinematic information emphasized), and high (non-kinematic information emphasized) spatial frequency conditions. Each shot was occluded one frame before shuttle-racquet contact or at contact. In deceptive trials, skilled players showed decreased anticipation accuracy in the high spatial frequency condition (p = .050) compared to normal and low spatial frequency conditions, which did not differ. The study suggests that an emphasis on kinematic information results in accurate anticipation in response to deceptive movements and that an emphasis on non-kinematic information results in less accurate anticipation by experts.
650 _adeception,
_950780
650 _aanticipation,
_950781
650 _a spatial frequency,
_950782
650 _aexpertise
_950783
700 _aRyu, Donghyun
_950784
700 _aUiga, Liis
_950785
773 0 _012374
_916462
_dSage,
_tPerception
_x1468-4233
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619837874
942 _2ddc
_cART
999 _c12681
_d12681