000			01956nab a2200253 4500
003			OSt
005			20220803122717.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220803b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aPark, So Hyun _950779
245			_aFalling for a Fake: _bThe Role of Kinematic and Non-kinematic Information in Deception Detection/
260			_bsage _c2019
300			_aVol 48, Issue 4, 2019 : ( 330-337 p.).
520			_aKinematic and non-kinematic visual information have been examined in the context of movement anticipation by athletes, although less so in deception detection. This study examined the role of kinematic and non-kinematic visual information in the anticipation of deceptive and non-deceptive badminton shots. Skilled (n = 12) and less skilled (n = 12) badminton players anticipated the direction of deceptive and non-deceptive shots presented via video footage displayed in normal (kinematic and non-kinematic information), low (kinematic information emphasized), and high (non-kinematic information emphasized) spatial frequency conditions. Each shot was occluded one frame before shuttle-racquet contact or at contact. In deceptive trials, skilled players showed decreased anticipation accuracy in the high spatial frequency condition (p = .050) compared to normal and low spatial frequency conditions, which did not differ. The study suggests that an emphasis on kinematic information results in accurate anticipation in response to deceptive movements and that an emphasis on non-kinematic information results in less accurate anticipation by experts.
650			_adeception, _950780
650			_aanticipation, _950781
650			_a spatial frequency, _950782
650			_aexpertise _950783
700			_aRyu, Donghyun _950784
700			_aUiga, Liis _950785
773	0		_012374 _916462 _dSage, _tPerception _x1468-4233
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619837874
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c12681 _d12681