000			01684nab a2200229 4500
003			OSt
005			20220801155108.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220729b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHuber, Matt _950411
245			_aResource geography II: What makes resources political?/
260			_bSage, _c2019.
300			_aVol 43, issue 3, 2019 : (553-564 p.).
520			_aWhat makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.
650			_aresources, _950412
650			_a the political, _949061
650			_a state, _950269
650			_anationalism _950413
773	0		_012579 _916491 _dLondon: Sage Publication Ltd, 2019. _tProgress in human geography/ _x 03091325
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518768604
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c12612 _d12612