000			02194nam a2200277 4500
003			OSt
005			20220803112558.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220721b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aSgouramani, Helena _949330
245			_aMove Still: The Effects of Implied and Real Motion on the Duration Estimates of Dance Steps/
260			_bsage _c2019
300			_aVol 48, Issue 7, 2019: ( 616-628 p.).
520			_aIt has been argued that movement can be implied by static cues of images depicting an instance of a dynamic event. Instances of implied motion have been investigated as a special type of stimulus with common processing mechanisms to those of real motion. Timing studies have reported a lengthening of the perceived time for moving as opposed to static stimuli and for stimuli of higher as compared to lower amounts of implied motion. However, the actual comparison of real versus implied motion on timing has never been investigated. In the present study, we compared directly the effect of two hypothetically analogous ballet steps with different amounts of movement and static instances of the dynamic peak of these events in a reproduction task. The analysis revealed an overestimation and lower response variability for real as compared to implied motion stimuli. These findings replicate and extend the apparent duration lengthening for moving as compared to static stimulation, even for static images containing implied motion, questioning whether or not the previously reported correspondence between real and implied motion transfers in the timing domain. This lack of correspondence was further supported by the finding that the amount of movement presented affected only displays of real motion.
650			_atime estimation, _949331
650			_aimplied motion, _949332
650			_adance, _948954
650			_abiological motion, _949333
650			_areproduction, _949334
650			_atime perception _949335
700			_a Moutoussis, Konstantinos _949336
700			_a Vatakis, Argiro _949337
773	0		_012374 _916462 _dSage, _tPerception _x1468-4233
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619854914
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c12440 _d12440