000			02190nab a2200289 4500
003			OSt
005			20220803112423.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220721b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRen, Yanna _949304
245			_aDoes Temporal Expectation Driven by Rhythmic Cues Differ From That Driven by Symbolic Cues Across the Millisecond and Second Range?/
260			_bsage _c2019
300			_aVol 48, Issue 6, 2019: (515-529 p.).
520			_aTemporal expectation relies on different predictive information, such as regular rhythms and symbolic cues, to direct attention to a future moment in time to optimize behaviour. However, whether differences exist between temporal expectations driven by regular rhythms and symbolic cues has not been clearly established. In this study, 20 participants performed two temporal expectation tasks in which a rhythmic cue or a symbolic cue indicated (70% expected) that the target would appear after an interval of 500 ms (short), 1,500 ms (medium), or 2,500 ms (long). We found larger cueing effects for the rhythmic cued task than for the symbolic cued task during the short interval, indicating that rhythmic cues were more effective in improving performance. Furthermore, no significant difference was found during the longer interval, reflect that the behavioural differences between the two forms of temporal expectations were likely to diminish as the time interval increased. Thus, we speculate that the temporal expectation driven by rhythmic cues differs from that driven by symbolic cues only in the limited time range; however, the mechanisms underlying the two forms of temporal expectations trend to become more similar over increasing temporal scales.
650			_arhythm, _949305
650			_asymbolic, _949306
650			_a temporal expectation, _949307
650			_aU-shaped curve, _949308
650			_acueing effect, _949309
650			_amillisecond, _949310
650			_a second _949311
700			_aXu, Zhihan _949312
700			_aWu , Fengxia _949313
773	0		_012374 _916462 _dSage, _tPerception _x1468-4233
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619847579
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c12437 _d12437