| 000 | 01844nab a22002537a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c11747 _d11747 |
||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20210616152602.0 | ||
| 007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
| 008 | 210616b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aGarrett, Bradley _933851 |
||
| 245 | _aOpening the bunker: Function, materiality, temporality | ||
| 260 |
_bSage, _c2019. |
||
| 300 | _aVol 37, Issue 6, 2019 (1063-1081 p.) | ||
| 520 | _aRecent scholarship has drawn attention to a ubiquitous 20th-century political space that was long overlooked – the bunker. This body of work draws on a variety of theoretical influences and explores multiple historical contexts, yet most remains wedded to the late Paul Virilio’s influential 1970s study of the Nazi Atlantic Wall. Enlightening as his ‘Bunker Archeology’ is, Virilio’s theorization has constrained contemporary debates around the function, materiality and temporality of the bunker. Here, we seek to counter this set of limitations in three ways. First, we contest the idea of the bunker as a simple space of human protection and argue for a more expansive conceptualization that is attentive to the bunker as a site of extermination. Second, we challenge the assumed concrete materiality of the bunker and suggest an expanded typology, utilizing a range of materials and milieux. Finally, we take to task readings of the bunker as an obsolete relic by highlighting the continued construction, re-appropriation and reimagination of this architectural form. | ||
| 650 |
_aBunkers, _946449 |
||
| 650 |
_a subterranean, _944784 |
||
| 650 |
_apreppers, _946450 |
||
| 650 |
_awar, _946451 |
||
| 650 |
_avertical _946452 |
||
| 700 |
_aKlinke, Ian _946453 |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_08872 _915873 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning C: _x1472-3425 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418816316 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||