| 000 | 01944nab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c11729 _d11729 |
||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20210615152645.0 | ||
| 007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
| 008 | 210615b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aWaite, David _935380 |
||
| 245 | _aSpaces of city-regionalism: Conceptualising pluralism in policymaking | ||
| 260 |
_bSage, _c2019. |
||
| 300 | _aVol 37, Issue 4, 2019 ( 689-706 p.) | ||
| 520 | _aCity-regionalism is now established as a key spatial arena for shaping sub-national urban policy. In these spaces, economic growth interests are marshalled within a competitiveness narrative as the dominant approach for the development of governance and policy. Yet such dominance in principle does not preclude other policy approaches from emerging and re-fashioning city-regionalism. In this paper, making reference to evolving city-region arrangements in the UK, specifically Cardiff, we explore and conceptualise policy pluralism. Our core argument is that to determine the possibilities for plural approaches to emerge, researchers can productively assess the intersections of relational and territorial geographies filtered through a micro–meso–macro framework. The framework positions governing principles, institutions and practices as mediators of, or triggers for, relational and territorial policymaking processes whose interaction may open up windows through which pluralistic approaches might develop. With such a conceptual approach applied in the context of city-regionalism, the break points in competitiveness-focused policymaking may more readily come into view. | ||
| 650 |
_aPolicy, _946337 |
||
| 650 |
_acity-regions, _946338 |
||
| 650 |
_apluralism, _946339 |
||
| 650 |
_a micro–meso–macro _946340 |
||
| 700 |
_aGillian Bristow _946341 |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_08872 _915873 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning C: _x1472-3425 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418791824 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||