000 02217nab a2200253 4500
999 _c11727
_d11727
003 OSt
005 20210614172415.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 210614b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aJoe Williams,
_946325
245 _aUrban resource nexus: On the politics of relationality, water–energy infrastructure and the fallacy of integration
260 _bSage,
_c2019.
300 _aVol 37, Issue 4, 2019 (652-669 p.)
520 _aThe ‘resource nexus’ has emerged over the past decade as an important new paradigm of environmental governance, which emphasises the interconnections, tensions and synergies between sectors that have traditionally been managed separately. Nexus thinking presents itself as a radically new approach to integrated governance in response to interconnected socio-environmental challenges and constraints. This paper provides a critical review of nexus thinking. The nexus paradigm, we contend, is part of a broader trend towards integrated environmental governance where previously externalised ‘bad’ nature is increasingly internalised by capital. In general, the nexus discourse has become techno-managerial in style, linear in its analysis and reductionist in its recommendations. Focussing particularly on urban water and energy infrastructure as important political sites in the (re)configuration of resource connectivities, we advance two principal arguments. Firstly, that the current nexus thinking inadequately conceptualises the scalar politics of interconnections between resource sectors. Secondly, we challenge the currently pervasive focus on technological and institutional ‘solutions’, efficiency-oriented ecological modernist vision and the presentation of ‘integration’ as a panacea for unsustainable resource practices.
650 _aWater–energy nexus,
_946326
650 _a infrastructure,
_946327
650 _a political ecology,
_946328
650 _aintegration,
_946329
650 _a neoliberalism
_932321
700 _aBouzarovski, Stefan
_946330
773 0 _08872
_915873
_dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010
_tEnvironment and planning C:
_x1472-3425
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18803370
942 _2ddc
_cART