000			02302nab a2200241 4500
999			_c11411 _d11411
003			OSt
005			20210804163217.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			210301b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMohan, Giles _931161
245			_aThe geopolitics of South–South infrastructure development: Chinese-financed energy projects in the global South
260			_bSage _c2019
300			_aVol 56, Issue 7, 2019 : (1368-1385 p.)
520			_aDebates around infrastructure tend to focus on the global North, yet in the global South demand for infrastructure is huge and we see new and emergent actors engaged in finance and construction; China being pre-eminent among them. China’s interests in the global South have grown apace over the past decade, especially in terms of accessing resources and securing infrastructure deals. The role of Chinese banks and State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in financing and building the projects reveals a blurring between geopolitical and commercial interests and processes. The article situates China’s entry into the global South as part of a geopolitics that is simultaneously geoeconomic and interrogates these issues through case studies of Chinese-backed projects in Ghana and Cambodia. These projects are spatially and politically complex, with China adopting a range of financing models – often including an element of resource swaps – in which bank finance is critical and marks the Chinese as different from Western financiers. These international deals are secured at the political elite level and so bypass established forms of national governance and accountability in the recipient countries, while the turnkey construction projects remain locally enclaved. The cases also show that wider developmental benefits are limited, with ‘ordinary’ citizens – especially those in the rural areas – gaining relatively little from these major energy projects and the benefits accruing to urban-based elites.
650			_aChina _944657
650			_afinance/financialisation _944658
650			_aeconomic development _944659
650			_adevelopment _944660
700			_aTan-Mullins, May _931595
773	0		_011188 _915499 _dsage, 2019. _tUrban studies
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018794351
942			_2ddc _cART