000 | 01617nab a2200241 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c11348 _d11348 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20210225122058.0 | ||
007 | ca aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 210225b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aIoannou, Stefanos _944078 |
||
245 | _aOn financialization and its future | ||
260 |
_bSage, _c2019. |
||
300 | _aVol 51, Issue 1, 2019 (263-271 p.) | ||
520 | _aBorn as a term with a critical connotation towards finance, financialization has been widely employed in social sciences, despite the vagueness often surrounding it. In this article we discuss the concept of financialization with a focus on three dimensions. First, we highlight the crucial role of theory in shaping the depth of one’s understanding of the term. Second, we discuss the merits and limitations of the term as a means for bringing together researchers from different communities. Third, we reflect on its future. We argue in particular that the various phenomena associated with financialization involve different boundaries and temporalities. These differences are important, first for appreciating the openness of possible outcomes, and second, for anticipating potential convergences in scholarly perceptions of financialization that might occur in the near future. | ||
650 |
_aFinance, _944079 |
||
650 |
_a financialization, _944080 |
||
650 |
_aheterodox economics, _944081 |
||
650 |
_a geography _944082 |
||
700 |
_aWójcik, Dariusz _944083 |
||
773 | 0 |
_011325 _915507 _dSage, 2019. _tEnvironmental and planning A: Economy and space |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18820912 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |