000			01999nab a2200313 4500
999			_c11320 _d11320
003			OSt
005			20210218144301.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			210218b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aWarren, Lynda M. _930304
245			_aIs Japanese Knotweed inherently damaging? Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Williams and Waistell [2018] EWCA Civ 1514
260			_bSage, _c2019.
300			_aVol 21, Issue 3, 2019(226-234 p.)
520			_aThe Court of Appeal in Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Williams and Waistell [2018] EWCA Civ 1514 held that the encroachment of Japanese Knotweed can be grounds for an action in nuisance if development or improvement of the property would require the treatment of contaminated soil and/or its licensed removal as controlled waste. The damage in this case was to the quiet enjoyment of the owners’ properties as a result of the loss in amenity value occasioned by the limitations on their use of the property without being encumbered with requirements for costly remediation. The case has potentially serious implications for conveyancing. The nature of the risk posed by Japanese Knotweed has recently been questioned and is being considered by the House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology.
650			_aAnti-social Behaviour, _933923
650			_aCrime and Policing Act 2014, _933751
650			_acommunity protection notice, _943583
650			_acontrolled waste, _943584
650			_aEnvironmental Protection Act 1990, _943585
650			_a House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology, _943586
650			_aJapanese Knotweed, _943587
650			_anon-native invasive species, _943588
650			_a private nuisance, _943589
650			_aquiet enjoyment, _943590
650			_aWildlife and Countryside Act 1981 section 14 _933515
773	0		_011304 _915506 _dSage, 2019. _tEnvironmental law review
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1461452919850309
942			_2ddc _cART