000			01519nab a2200217 4500
999			_c11314 _d11314
003			OSt
005			20210217162238.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			210217b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHilson, Chris _943492
245			_aSensitivity in the law of nuisance: Should people in glass houses expect voyeurs? Fearn v Tate Gallery [2019] EWHC 246 (Ch)
260			_bSage, _c2019.
300			_aVol 21, Issue 2, 2019( 136-139 p.)
520			_aThe case Fearn v Tate Gallery involved claims brought by luxury London flat owners for breach of privacy in relation to the Tate Modern’s nearby viewing platform. One of the key issues in the case, heard by Mann J in the High Court, was whether the floor-to-ceiling glass windows of the flats – through which members of the public on the viewing platform could easily gaze – meant the residents were unduly sensitive users of the land for the purposes of the tort of nuisance. This case note considers this question along with the principle in nuisance that it is normally no defence to say that the claimant came to the nuisance. Both sensitivity and the coming to the nuisance (non-) defence are important elements of nuisance as an environmental tort and hence the case is worthy of note for environmental lawyers.
650			_aNuisance, _943493
650			_a privacy, _943494
650			_asensitivity, _943495
650			_acoming to the nuisance _943496
773	0		_011304 _915506 _dSage, 2019. _tEnvironmental law review
942			_2ddc _cART