000 01951nab a2200253 4500
999 _c11227
_d11227
003 OSt
005 20210203155535.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 210203b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aFriendly, Abigail
_934081
245 _aParadigm or paradox? The ‘cumbersome impasse’ of the participatory turn in Brazilian urban planning
260 _bSage
_c2019
300 _aVol 56, Issue 2, 2019 : (271-287 p.)
520 _aThe Brazilian urban reform movement expanded citizen participation in decision-making processes through a policy environment motivated by a right to the city (RTC), a collective development strategy for political transformation. Yet recent events evidence that social exclusion and spatial segregation remain dominant features of the Brazilian city. These contradictions have led planning scholars and practitioners to grapple with misalignment between the reform movement’s paradigmatic goals and its paradoxical failures. We build upon this genre of thinking to assess critical areas of paradigm and paradox in Brazilian planning – insurgent urbanism, informality and knowledge – each of which is rooted in the lesser-understood concept of autogestão for improving the equity of land division through urban planning.1 Although not all inclusive of the issues faced by Brazilian cities, these three categories were selected for best representing how Brazil’s participatory turn established a range of paradigmatic and paradoxical conditions that can help us to understand cities in Brazil and beyond and might better leverage autogestão in the future.
650 _aBrazil
_942326
650 _ainequality
_934332
650 _aparticipation
_942327
650 _ainformality
_939718
650 _ahousing
_942328
700 _aStiphany, Kristine
_942329
773 0 _011188
_915499
_dsage, 2019.
_tUrban studies
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018768748
942 _2ddc
_cART