000 01749nab a2200277 4500
999 _c11192
_d11192
003 OSt
005 20210202143451.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 210202b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aOonk, Carla
_942134
245 _aEducating Boundary Crossing Planners: Evidence for Student Learning in the Multistakeholder Regional Learning Environment
260 _bSage,
_c2019.
300 _aVol 39, Issue 3, 2019 (360-373 p.)
520 _aThe regional learning environment (RLE) embeds planning student learning in a real-world participatory planning process. This study investigates the effectiveness of the RLE and its “boundary crossing” design characteristics with respect to student learning. The quasi-experimental study combines a quantitative competence test (N = 225) with qualitative student and teacher learning reports. The RLE, in general, stimulates planning students’ learning. “Working in multidisciplinary student groups” and “high coaching intensity” have specific added value for learning. “Intense student–stakeholder collaboration” does not significantly improve learning; however, qualitative data indicate this to be a powerful boundary crossing design principle of the RLE.
650 _aauthentic learning environment,
_942135
650 _a boundary crossing,
_942136
650 _a competence development,
_942137
650 _a multidisciplinary,
_942138
650 _a multistakeholder,
_942139
650 _aplanning education
_942140
700 _aGulikers, Judith
_942141
700 _aMulder, Martin
_942142
773 0 _011153
_915496
_dSage, 2019.
_tJournal of Planning Education and Research
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17737598
942 _2ddc
_cART