| 000 | 01502nab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c11174 _d11174 |
||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20210127103201.0 | ||
| 007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
| 008 | 210127b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aFreestone, Robert _941379 |
||
| 245 | _aLearning from LA : Australian Responses to Los Angeles Urbanism 1910–1960 | ||
| 260 |
_bSage _c2019 |
||
| 300 | _aVol 55, Issue 1, 2019 : (44-65 p.) | ||
| 520 | _aFrom the 1910s to the 1950s, Los Angeles was a surprising exemplar of progressive planning for Australian cities. LA’s planned neighborhoods early captured the garden suburb ideal. Regional planning initiatives attracted increasing interest, then transport planning and management of auto traffic. Mechanisms of urban governance and formal alliances between private and public sectors followed. This learning from abroad is set within the paradigm of urban policy transfer, highlighting the selectivity of borrowing within the dominant ideology of town and country planning. From the 1960s, positive connotations would be extinguished by new representations of a sprawling, divided, and polluted metropolis. | ||
| 650 |
_a Los Angeles _941380 |
||
| 650 |
_a urban growth machine _941381 |
||
| 650 |
_a twentieth century _934632 |
||
| 650 |
_apolicy transfer _941382 |
||
| 650 |
_aAustralia _941383 |
||
| 700 |
_aJames, Peggy _941384 |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_011163 _915497 _dSage, 2019 _tJournal of planning history |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1538513218755497 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||