000			01448nab a2200229 4500
999			_c11126 _d11126
003			OSt
005			20210112161009.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			210112b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aAksel Hagen, _939747
245			_aCalculate, Communicate, and Innovate: Do We Need “Innovate” as a Third Position?
300			_aVol 34, Issue 4, 2019(421-433 p.)
520			_a“Innovation” has become a pertinent and frequently used term in relation to public-sector administration and planning. This article is a review of the planning theory debate from the 1960s until today focusing on the definitions, understandings, and uses of the innovation. We seek to answer the following three questions regarding the use of the overlapping terms “innovate,” “innovative,” and “innovation” in planning theory texts: (i) To what extent have they been used? (ii) In what sense and to what purpose? and (iii) Are we heading for a third position (“innovate”) in planning theory, such that “communicate,” “calculate,” and “innovate” are three interplaying approaches?
650			_ainnovate, _939748
650			_a innovative planning, _939749
650			_a communicate, _939750
650			_acommunicative planning _939751
700			_a Ulla Higdem _939752
773	0		_011114 _915488 _dSage, 2019. _tJournal of planning literature
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219851876
942			_2ddc _cART