000 01542nab a2200253 4500
999 _c11123
_d11123
003 OSt
005 20210112153814.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 210112b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _a Verweij, Stefan
_939690
245 _aQualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in Spatial Planning Research and Related Disciplines: A Systematic Literature Review of Applications
260 _bSage,
_c2019.
300 _aVol 34, Issue 3, 2019( 300-317 p.)
520 _aQualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is a potentially interesting method for spatial planning researchers. Although increasingly used, its application in spatial planning research is lagging behind other disciplines. We conducted a systematic literature review of QCA applications in spatial planning and related disciplines (SPARD), addressing two questions: when, where, and how is QCA used in SPARD and what are the main advantages of QCA for spatial planning research? We found that the main reasons why QCA is used in SPARD are its sensitivity to context, its ability to use small-/medium-n cases, and its attention to causal complexity.
650 _aliterature review,
_939691
650 _aspatial planning,
_939692
650 _ageography,
_939693
650 _aenvironmental sciences,
_939694
650 _a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)
_933410
700 _aElen-Maarja Trell
_939695
773 0 _011114
_915488
_dSage, 2019.
_tJournal of planning literature
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219841490
942 _2ddc
_cART