| 000 | 01589nab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c10617 _d10617 |
||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20200915125639.0 | ||
| 007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
| 008 | 200915b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aStrauss, Kendra _930229 |
||
| 245 | _aProcess, mechanism and the project of economic geography | ||
| 260 |
_bSage _c2019 |
||
| 300 | _aVol 9, Issue 3, 2019:(256-261 p.) | ||
| 520 | _aThis response engages Yeung’s arguments about the value of critical realism (CR) in economic geography (EG), and how they can be further strengthened by better theorizing mechanism and process in relation to mid-level concepts like neoliberalization and path dependence. While there is much to value in the attention Yeung pays to how economic geographers conceptualize and study relational socio-spatial change, I argue that the lack of attention to how mid-level concepts relate to macro-level structures hampers the goal of more robust theorizing. Moreover, the association of CR with the reassertion of a disciplinary ‘core’ suggests a normative project that ignores or marginalizes diverse critical approaches in EG, which are framed as a sign of weaknesses rather than disciplinary strength. | ||
| 650 |
_acritical realism _930219 |
||
| 650 |
_alabour geography _930230 |
||
| 650 |
_afeminist geography _930197 |
||
| 650 |
_aepistemology _930231 |
||
| 650 |
_aeconomic geography _930232 |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_010527 _915376 _dSage Publications Ltd., 2019 _tDialogues in human geography. _w(OSt)20840795 _x2043-8214 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619875329 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||