| 000 | 01282nab a22002417a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c10613 _d10613 |
||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20200915112311.0 | ||
| 007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
| 008 | 200915b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aProudfoot, Jesse _930209 |
||
| 245 | _aThe stakes of situated knowledges | ||
| 260 |
_bSage _c2019 |
||
| 300 | _aVol 9, Issue 2, 2019:(158-161 p.) | ||
| 520 | _aThis commentary explores the politics of Dragos Simandan’s (2019) proposal to expand the concept of situated knowledge beyond social difference. I argue that while an expanded conception of situated knowledges is welcome, Simandan’s focus on de-politicized instances of situated knowledge ends up blunting the theory’s critical edge. Any attempt to expand situated knowledge beyond social difference must ensure that we do not lose sight of the ways that our embodied positions within fields of power affect the production of knowledge. | ||
| 650 |
_aembodiment _930210 |
||
| 650 |
_asituated knowledge _930211 |
||
| 650 |
_areflexivity _930212 |
||
| 650 |
_apositionality _930213 |
||
| 650 |
_apolitics _930198 |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_010527 _915376 _dSage Publications Ltd., 2019 _tDialogues in human geography. _w(OSt)20840795 _x2043-8214 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619850270 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||