000			01658nab a2200241 4500
999			_c10610 _d10610
003			OSt
005			20200915105233.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			200915b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aSimandan, Dragos _930196
245			_aRevisiting positionality and the thesis of situated knowledge
300			_aVol 9, Issue 2, 2019:(129-149 p.)
520			_aFeminist and queer epistemologies have been influential throughout the social sciences by means of the development of a set of interrelated approaches involving positionality, partiality, reflexivity, intersectionality, and the highly politicized thesis of situated knowledge. This article aims to operationalize these approaches by introducing an anti-humanist, politically attuned, and historically contextualized framework, which postulates that one’s knowledge is inevitably incomplete and situated because information about the world always reaches one through a channel that is constituted by four epistemic gaps: (1) ‘possible worlds versus realized world’, (2) ‘realized world versus witnessed situation’, (3) ‘witnessed situation versus remembered situation’, and (4) ‘remembered situation versus confessed situation’.
650			_afeminist and queer epistemologies _930197
650			_asocial justice _930190
650			_asocial difference _930190
650			_apolitics of knowledge _930198
650			_amemory _930199
650			_aintersectionality _930200
773	0		_010527 _915376 _dSage Publications Ltd., 2019 _tDialogues in human geography. _w(OSt)20840795 _x2043-8214
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619850013
942			_2ddc _cART