000 | 01794nab a22002657a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c10609 _d10609 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20200915104134.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 200915b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aIbert, Oliver _930188 |
||
245 | _aPositioning and ‘doing’ geographies of dissociation | ||
260 |
_bSage _c2019 |
||
300 | _aVol 9, Issue 1, 2019:(88-93 p.) | ||
520 | _aInspired by five commentaries on our forum article, in this response article we elaborate on three points related to geographies of dissociation, namely positioning dissociation, dealing with plurality and moving from agenda-setting to empirical research. In order to assess the validity of critique elaborated in the commentaries, we specify the contribution we seek to make. Geographies of dissociation aim to contribute to a strand of cultural economic geography that has become increasingly interested in the social construction of symbolic value but that still lacks a conceptual vocabulary for addressing the loopholes and missing links in these relational webs and their related geographies. We explain how geographies of dissociation build on pluralism without ignoring epistemological frictions. Furthermore, we discuss how geographies of dissociation might inspire political economic approaches and future empirical research. | ||
650 |
_abranding _930189 |
||
650 |
_asocial construction of value _930190 |
||
650 |
_aconceptual pluralism _930191 |
||
700 |
_aHess, Martin _930192 |
||
700 |
_aPower, Dominic _930193 |
||
700 |
_aMüller, Felix _930194 |
||
700 |
_aKleibert, Jana _930195 |
||
773 | 0 |
_010527 _915376 _dSage Publications Ltd., 2019 _tDialogues in human geography. _w(OSt)20840795 _x2043-8214 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619832725 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |