000 01794nab a22002657a 4500
999 _c10609
_d10609
003 OSt
005 20200915104134.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 200915b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aIbert, Oliver
_930188
245 _aPositioning and ‘doing’ geographies of dissociation
260 _bSage
_c2019
300 _aVol 9, Issue 1, 2019:(88-93 p.)
520 _aInspired by five commentaries on our forum article, in this response article we elaborate on three points related to geographies of dissociation, namely positioning dissociation, dealing with plurality and moving from agenda-setting to empirical research. In order to assess the validity of critique elaborated in the commentaries, we specify the contribution we seek to make. Geographies of dissociation aim to contribute to a strand of cultural economic geography that has become increasingly interested in the social construction of symbolic value but that still lacks a conceptual vocabulary for addressing the loopholes and missing links in these relational webs and their related geographies. We explain how geographies of dissociation build on pluralism without ignoring epistemological frictions. Furthermore, we discuss how geographies of dissociation might inspire political economic approaches and future empirical research.
650 _abranding
_930189
650 _asocial construction of value
_930190
650 _aconceptual pluralism
_930191
700 _aHess, Martin
_930192
700 _aPower, Dominic
_930193
700 _aMüller, Felix
_930194
700 _aKleibert, Jana
_930195
773 0 _010527
_915376
_dSage Publications Ltd., 2019
_tDialogues in human geography.
_w(OSt)20840795
_x2043-8214
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619832725
942 _2ddc
_cART