A Spatial Perspective on the Econometrics of Program Evaluation/ (Record no. 14103)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02049nab a2200193 4500 |
| 005 - DATE & TIME | |
| control field | 20230731115017.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 230731b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Kolak, Marynia |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | A Spatial Perspective on the Econometrics of Program Evaluation/ |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc | Sage, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2020. |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Pages | Vol 43, Issue 1-2, 2020( 128–153 p.) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Empirical work in regional science has seen a growing interest in causal inference, leveraging insights from econometrics, statistics, and related fields. This has resulted in several conceptual as well as empirical papers. However, the role of spatial effects, such as spatial dependence (SD) and spatial heterogeneity (SH), is less well understood in this context. Such spatial effects violate the so-called stable unit treatment value assumption advanced by Rubin as part of the foundational framework for empirical treatment effect analysis. In this article, we consider the role of spatial effects more closely. We provide a brief overview of a number of attempts to extend existing econometric treatment effect evaluation methods with an accounting for spatial aspects and outline and illustrate an alternative approach. Specifically, we propose a spatially explicit counterfactual framework that leverages spatial panel econometrics to account for both SD and SH in treatment choice, treatment variation, and treatment effects. We illustrate this framework with a replication of a well-known treatment effect analysis, that is, the evaluation effect of minimum legal drinking age laws on mortality for US states during the period 1970–1984, a classic textbook example of applied causal inference. We replicate the results available in the literature and compare these to a range of alternative specifications that incorporate spatial effects.<br/> |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| Added Entry Personal Name | Anselin, Luc |
| 773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Host Biblionumber | 11129 |
| Host Itemnumber | 17016 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | Sage, 2019. |
| Title | International regional science review |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017619869781 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | E-Journal |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| -- | 56533 |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| -- | 56534 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| -- | ddc |
No items available.