Rethinking PGIS: Participatory or (post)political GIS?/ (Record no. 12592)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02488nab a2200253 4500
005 - DATE & TIME
control field 20220801152036.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 220728b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Radil, Steven M.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Rethinking PGIS: Participatory or (post)political GIS?/
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Sage,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2019.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Pages Vol 43, issue 2, 2019 : (195-213 p.).
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Participatory GIS (PGIS) emerged from the contentious GIS debates of the 1990s as a means of political intervention in issues of social and environmental justice. PGIS has since matured into a distinct subfield in which GIS is used to enhance the political engagement of historically marginalized people and to shape political outcomes through mapping. However, this has proven to be difficult work. We suggest that this is because PGIS, particularly in its community development incarnations, though well-intentioned in endeavoring to enhance the voices of the excluded, is inherently limited because it primarily aims to enhance the inclusion and participation of the historically marginalized by working within established frameworks of institutionalized governance in particular places. This, we suggest, has left this mode of PGIS ill-equipped to truly challenge the political-economic structures responsible for (re)producing the very conditions of socio-economic inequality it strives to ameliorate. As a result, we argue that PGIS has become de-politicized, operating within, rather than disrupting, existing spheres of political-economic power. Moving forward, we suggest that PGIS is in need of being retheorized by engaging with the emergent post-politics literature and related areas of critical social and political theory. We argue that by adopting a more radical conception of democracy, justice, and ‘the political’, PGIS praxis can be recentered around disruption rather than participation and, ultimately, brought closer to its self-proclaimed goal of supporting progressive change for the historically marginalized.
650 ## - Subject
Subject consensus, governance,
650 ## - Subject
Subject participatory GIS,
650 ## - Subject
Subject participatory research,
650 ## - Subject
Subject post-politics,
650 ## - Subject
Subject stakeholder collaboration
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
Added Entry Personal Name Anderson, Matthew B.
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Host Biblionumber 12579
Host Itemnumber 16491
Place, publisher, and date of publication London: Sage Publication Ltd, 2019.
Title Progress in human geography/
International Standard Serial Number 03091325
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517750774
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Articles
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
-- 50277
650 ## - Subject
-- 50278
650 ## - Subject
-- 50279
650 ## - Subject
-- 50280
650 ## - Subject
-- 49071
650 ## - Subject
-- 50281
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
-- 50282
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
-- ddc

No items available.

Library, SPA Bhopal, Neelbad Road, Bhauri, Bhopal By-pass, Bhopal - 462 030 (India)
Ph No.: +91 - 755 - 2526805 | E-mail: [email protected]

OPAC best viewed in Mozilla Browser in 1366X768 Resolution.
Free counter