Safety net? The use of vouchers when a place-based rental subsidy ends (Record no. 11511)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02178nab a2200253 4500 |
| 005 - DATE & TIME | |
| control field | 20210310123844.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 210310b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Reina, Vincent J |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Safety net? The use of vouchers when a place-based rental subsidy ends |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc | Sage, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2019. |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Pages | Vol 56, Issue 10, 2019,(2092-2111 p.) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | The US government moved to a private ownership model for providing affordable housing in the 1960s, which resulted in millions of housing units being developed and governed by affordability restrictions that expire at some later point. By 2010, thousands of tenants lived in properties where a private owner, or US Department of Housing and Urban Development, terminated the rental subsidy, and many more will face this reality going forward. Households in the project-based Section 8 programme are offered a voucher when the subsidy contract ends. This as of right voucher represents the only federal rental safety net programme in the USA. Despite this reality, little is known about what happens to tenants when a subsidy contract ends, including whether or how they use their vouchers. This paper creates a national census of every tenant who lived in a property in the USA where the project-based Section 8 subsidy ended through 2010 to analyse this event. The analysis includes a series of models that analyse what factors are associated with voucher use, moves, and opportunity moves. This paper finds that the voucher is not used by the majority of households, despite high levels of household demand for the subsidy. Those who use the voucher and move tend to move to lower poverty tracts. However, the subsidy offers the weakest safety net for households where the head is older than 62 or Black. |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | low-income housing,关 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | mobility, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | Section 8, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | subsidised housing, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | vouchers |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| Added Entry Personal Name | Winter, Ben |
| 773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Host Biblionumber | 11188 |
| Host Itemnumber | 15499 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | sage, 2019. |
| Title | Urban studies |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018782407 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Articles |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| -- | 45124 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 31926 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 45125 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 45126 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 45127 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 39282 |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| -- | 36344 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| -- | ddc |
No items available.