Recognize the tyranny of distance: A spatial reading of Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt (Record no. 11450)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03180nam a2200241 4500
005 - DATE & TIME
control field 20210303122929.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210303b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Michele Statz
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Recognize the tyranny of distance: A spatial reading of Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Sage,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2019.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Pages Vol 51, Issue 5, 2019,(1106-1127 p.)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Distance—physical, material distance—is an obviously spatial concept, but one rarely engaged by legal or feminist geographers. We take up this oversight in relation to the 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, which adjudicated the constitutionality of a Texas law that imposed new regulations on abortion providers. Because half of the state’s abortion providers were unable to meet these regulations and thus closed, the distance that many Texas women had to travel for abortion services increased dramatically. In part because of these increases, the Supreme Court ultimately determined that the Texas laws imposed an unconstitutional “undue burden.” Bringing together case law and ethnographic data, this article traces the process by which distance is made legally “legible” in the context of reproductive injustice. In so doing, it confronts more uneasy realities of distance, including the discursive dismissal of social and literal immobility and isolation; contradictory readings of “emptiness”; and the material spatiality of distance through the nonplace-ness of rural areas. Together, these factors illuminate a more significant distance, namely the epistemic and social distance that exists between the legal performance of distance in litigation and the embodied traversal of distance by a woman seeking an abortion in Texas. Prioritizing rural distance as material, legal and gendered, our work engages and augments the nascent field of feminist legal geographies. It likewise challenges legal geographers’ insistence on urban space by uncovering the ways in which even the relative “emptiness” of distance is intimately consequential. Finally, this paper makes connections between the exercise of the abortion right and the exercise of other rights that implicate distance, most notably the right to vote. Just as abortion regulations have often had the effect of requiring women to travel farther for abortion services, voter ID laws have the effect of requiring voters to travel to a public agency in order to secure the requisite identity document. Other voting regulations and state and local voting practices may similarly impose spatial burdens on voters. We thus assert that what Whole Woman’s Health reveals about making distance legally cognizable finds ready legal application in other contexts.
650 ## - Subject
Subject Distance,
650 ## - Subject
Subject reproductive justice,
650 ## - Subject
Subject feminist legal geography,
650 ## - Subject
Subject rurality
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
Added Entry Personal Name Pruitt, Lisa R
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Host Biblionumber 11325
Host Itemnumber 15507
Place, publisher, and date of publication Sage, 2019.
Title Environmental and planning A: Economy and space
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18757508
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Articles
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
-- 44841
650 ## - Subject
-- 44842
650 ## - Subject
-- 44843
650 ## - Subject
-- 30197
650 ## - Subject
-- 42572
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
-- 44844
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
-- ddc

No items available.

Library, SPA Bhopal, Neelbad Road, Bhauri, Bhopal By-pass, Bhopal - 462 030 (India)
Ph No.: +91 - 755 - 2526805 | E-mail: [email protected]

OPAC best viewed in Mozilla Browser in 1366X768 Resolution.
Free counter